Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-4 or 4t |
---|---|
From: | "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Apr 1999 20:48:16 +0000 |
Have you read the text file at Lee Hawkings site about the punishing environmental testing of a 4Ti ? Giles PCACala@xxxxxxx wrote: > advertising hype over the years: the OM-4Ti was claimed to have better seals > than the OM-4/OM-3/OM-2S family vs. the OM-1 & 1n/2 & 2n family. It was a > characteristic I followed closely given my field use in at or near 100% > relative humidity climates. But I sure can't locate where I read about that. > Maybe it was discussed in a camera magazine review. > I'm of the opinion this was just advertising hype, though. If one changes a > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 85-250 vs Canon 70-200L (surpise?), GPaul64 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: Kodak Black & White +400, Barry B. Bean |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4 or 4t, Barry B. Bean |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4 or 4t, PCACala |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |