I have an SC 135/3.5 which can perform quite well if used carefully. Main
problems are lack of speed in low light contibuting to focus error, and
softness wide open. I have some very nice 8x10 portraits taken with this lens
which prove its worth to me.
The 75-150 is common around here for $129 to 159 CDN.
On 19 Mar 99, at 9:31, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> At 01:26 PM 3/18/99 -0800, you wrote:
> >For Cdn$99 + taxes I bought a used E.Zuiko 135mm / f3.5 lens from one of our
> >mainline camera stores. From both ends of the lens the optics are without
> >any visible blemish and there are no dings or scratches on the outer body.
> >Did I over or under pay? Are there any opinions on the performance of this
> >lens?
> >
> >I also saw a used Zuiko 75mm / 150mm [f3.5 or f4.5] zoom for about Cdn$150.
> >It was in like condition to the 135mm / f3.5. The store manager opined that
> >this lens would produce slightly less sharp images than the 135mm lens. Is
> >Cdn150 a reasonable price for the zoom and are there any opinions as to the
> >performance of this lens and in particular about the "lack" of performance
> >as compared to the 135mm?
> >
> >Thanks in advance for all and opinions!
> >
> >John Hudson
> >
> John,
>
> For all intents and purposes, I don't think you'll notice a lot of
> difference between your 135/3.5 and 75-150/4 at 135, provided the zoom is a
> good sample. There seems to be a lot of variance among samples of the
> 75-150, it being reportedly prone to possible element separation. John
> Hermanson discussed this once upon a time, and it's probably recoverable
> from the archives. The 135/f3.5 is a good lens, though somewhat more on
> the average side among Zuikos IMHO. It is stalwart and I don't hesitate to
> use it in the company of my 85/f2 and 200/f4. Mine is also an SC, as is the
> example you mention in the subject line; an MC version might provide
> additional emotional satisfaction at least <g>; the zoom is of course MC.
>
> Based on what you say, I would sort of guess that the store manager is
> pontificating conventional wisdom rather than sincere knowledge of these
> lenses.
>
> I would say that's a fair price for the zoom. It won't win you bragging
> rights on the list, but it's not embarrassing either.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Joel
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
========================
Shawn Wright
Computer Systems Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
250-743-6240
swright@xxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|