Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #817 |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Mar 1999 13:08:02 +0800 |
It is very subjective, I feel the shots from 50/2 sometimes a bit "hard", while the tonal gradation of the 50/3.5 seems better. C.H.Ling > >Actually I like the shots from 50/3.5 more than the 50/2, although the > >shots from 50/2 looks sharper in most cases. > > > >C.H.Ling > > Interesting. Why? > > --Kelton > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #817, kelton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 55mm f/1.2 Lens, Gary Schloss |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #817, kelton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] RE: Olympus RD & XA vs Rollei 35 SE & TE, Angel Lobo Caballero |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |