On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Gary Schloss wrote:
|C.H.Ling wrote:
|
|>Concerning fast Zuiko Macro 90/2 and 50/2 I found that at long distance (a
|>34 floors building at around 50m from my house, it is my always testing
|>target), 100/2 has higher resolution than 90/2 at both F2 and F4 and my
|>newly acquired 55/1.2 has higher resolution than the 50/2 when both at F4.
|>
|>The above two Zuikos Macro I once own (yes both sold) were in mint
|>condition so I think the result was not affected by dog lenses.
|
|C.H., just to remind you that a true macro lens performance is optimized
|to be best at _close_ distances, whereas the 100/2 and 55/1.2 are likely
|optimized for best performance at infinity.
|
|IMHO, with the 50/2 and 90/2 macros Olympus did an admirable job of
|balancing these contradictory requirements, but I bet that your above
|results are "by design" rather than an accident.
In particular the 50/3.5, 50/2, 90/2, and 135/4.5 macros are optimized
for 1:10 lifesize reproduction. Their flexibility as general purpose
lenses are huge pluses.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|