Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] New OM 35-70

Subject: Re: [OM] New OM 35-70
From: "Rand E. Tomcala" <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 19:29:11 -0500
Dave (et all),
  Check in Gary's (Reese) lens tests, he just tested one that I
currently have.  A reprint of his test is as follows:
I would appear to be a little better than one would expect.
Rand E.
-----------------------
35-70mm f/3.5~4.8 S Zuiko

(with comparative SQF values from Popular
Photography, published April 1998)

@ 35mm setting

Vignetting = B-@f/3.5, A-@f/5.6

Distortion = very pronounced barrel

Aperture  Center    Corner    Popular Photography
SQF

f/3.6     C+        B-        F

f/5.6     B-        B-        B+

f/8       B         B         A

f/11      B         B         A

f/16      B         B-        B+

f/22      B         C+        B


@ 50mm setting

Vignetting = B+@f/4, A-@f/5.6, A@f/8

Distortion = slight barrel

Aperture  Center    Corner    Popular Photography
SQF    

f/3.6     C         B         C+

f/5.6     B+        B         B

f/8       B         B+        A

f/11      B+        B         A

f/16      B         B         B+

f/22      B-        B-        B

Note: Contrasty images.


@ 70mm setting

Vignetting = A-

Distortion = none

Aperture  Center    Corner    Popular Photography
SQF

f/3.6     C-        C-        D

f/5.6     B-        B-        B

f/8       B+        B-        B+

f/11      B+        B         B+

f/16      B         B         B

f/22      B         C+        C+

Note: contrasty at expense of resolution for all
focal lengths.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Bulger wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 07:52:36AM -0600, Dave Bulger wrote:
> >> How come and for why is the new 35-70 (the one that usually comes with
> the
> >> OM2000) so inexpensive?  Not that I'm complaining, mind you, just that
> I've
> >> learned that things that appear to be too good to be true generally
> are...
> 
> >Have you handled one? It's light, cheap plastic throughout. I was
> singularly
> >unimpressed.
> 
> Can't say that I have -- my total exposure to the lens and the OM2000 has
> been strictly through ads and the like.
> 
> My current 35-70/4 is a) a bit loose on the focus & zoom, b) no detents or
> "clicks" on the aperture settings, and c) is pretty bulky/heavy compared to
> the Tokina 35-70 it replaced.  I'm kinda trying to stick to Zuikos these
> days if it's financially feasible, so this one caught my eye.
> 
> Anyone have any idea as to the sharpness/contrast of this lens?
> 
> Rgds,
> 
> Dave
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz