Subject: | RE: [OM] Is the non-MD OM-1 considered "rare"? |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Feb 1999 14:59:51 +1100 |
Gary wrote: > This must be a prime contender for the understatement of the year. > Jeez, $40 for a T-20/T-32 calculator panel ?! Boy, I feel sooooo > _cheap_ :-) :-) Me too - I only paid $AU20 (~$US13) for a T20 ! Wayne Harridge Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/ < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 707,101 and 2000 and beyond (RANT), Dave Haynie |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] The Unofficial Olympus OM SIF: phase 2/10 completed!, PCACala |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is the non-MD OM-1 considered "rare"?, ClassicVW |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is the non-MD OM-1 considered "rare"?, ClassicVW |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |