Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 4T lenses

Subject: Re: [OM] 4T lenses
From: "Rand E. Tomcala" <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 18:41:36 -0500
Brian (et all),
  I took part in that  discussion on the Tamron Adaptall2 mounts and
read all postings avidly.  The conclusion that I came to is that there
seems to be no clear cut rule as to which markings are OK and which are
not.  The only rule that I saw come of the many postings was that we
should each check the particular mounts that we have in our possession
and take appropriate action.
Rand E.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Brian P. Huber" wrote:
> 
> Barry,
> >From I can gather, there are two possible sources of damage to a 4 or 4T 
> >caused by a lens, there may be more however.
> 
> It seems the most likely source is a Tamron Adaptall 2 lens that has a 
> designation of "OM" on the camera side of the
> mount.  From all that I can gather on this list and have also seen, the 
> Tamron Adapters that have the designation "OL"
> are more recent and OK.  I don't have the "OM" adapters, so I can't tell you 
> what else to look for.  For some reason, I seem to recall
> that Gary Schloss might have more info on this.
> Some people have mentioned filling in the screw hole on Tamron "OM" adapters 
> that are near the little black button.
> 
> I have heard that there is a possibility that some older Vivitar lenses may 
> damage the button, but I've got some pretty old Vivitar lenses
> (1975 vintage) and can't see any possibility of damaging the button with them.
> 
> I just went through this damage issue and believe me, I've checked all my 
> lenses for this potential problem.
> The little black button being depressed is the means that enables the 4 to be 
> placed into Spot mode.  If this button is sheared
> off, the Spot mode would not work, but normal Automatic mode would still 
> function.
> 
> I also just bought an uglee 4TI.  No paint on back at all, lots gone from top 
> and bottom plates.  So ugly, I figure no one will
> ever steal it.  The fact that I got it for $50 just makes it even better!  
> But man, is it ugly!
> Brian Huber
> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Barry B. Bean [SMTP:bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:   Tuesday, February 16, 1999 12:03 PM
> To:     Zuiko-holics Anonymous
> Subject:        [OM] 4T lenses
> 
> I jut received a used 4T (the infamous ugly 4t from eBay a few weeks
> ago - it looks better in person), and have heard that some lens may
> not be compatible with the 3 and 4 due to an extra button, or switch
> on the lens mount that can be sheared off. How can I spot a lens to
> be avoided?
> 
> BBB
> -
> B.B. Bean                                       bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms                http://www.beancotton.com
> Peach Orchard, MO
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz