Jim;
I do my own Cibachrome printing. I can think of the following I've done off
the top:
Zuiko 50/1.2 @ F/5.6 or F/8 16x20s look 'fantastic'. This lens rivals my
med format gear at these apertures.
Zuiko 350/2.8 @F/8 16x20s look 'fantastic'. Just one image so
far. Great bokeh even at this aperture
Zuiko 65-200 @ F/11 16x20s look good.
Zuiko 24/2.8 @F/? 16x20s look good.
Zuiko 35/2 @F/8 16x20s look good.
I've printed great 11x14s from the above and the following: (have not attempted
to go bigger)
300/4.5; 50/1.8; 90/2
George
At 04:40 PM 2/1/99 +0800, you wrote:
> So much of comparing the different range of Zuiko lenses and comments.
> I would like to hear your personal comments on the max. blown up taken
> using your Zuiko lenses.
>
> The reason is that the impact is totally different from what you see
> in a 4R print. At the same time to know what is the max. good quality
> print size can be achieved using diff. Zuiko lenses/film.
>
>
> Jim Teo
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|