| Subject: | Re: [OM] 90 macro |
|---|---|
| From: | PCACala@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:39:11 EST |
Jim writes: > Can I say that the 90/2 is as good as the 100/2 or better??? > Or is it subjuct to individual opinion?? Give me a few days and I'll have an answer to that, albeit for a single testing approach at the 1:40 magnification ratio only. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Exposure memory and center weighted metering was: Olympus, P2CON |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Blade Count request for lens page, PCACala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re[2]: [OM] 90 macro, JIM_TEO |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: [OM] 90 macro, John Petrush |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |