In the late 70s atleast, the 100 2.8 beat out the Nikkor 105 in Japanese
"Consumer Reports" type photography magazines. The 100 2.8 is a great
lens.
John
Gary Schloss wrote:
>
> James Olson wrote:
>
> >the recent posts regarding the 100/2 zuiko have perked my interest.
> >i've never really heard much about this lens. my 100/2.8 is my least
> >favorite lens in my line up, and it's the one i wish to replace.
>
> Hmm, what's your complaint about the 100/2.8? Until it got replaced
> with 100/2, the 100/2.8 was one of my favorite Zuikos.
>
> >several people have stated that they love their 100/2, (maybe love is
> >too strong a word?)
>
> Hey, call me a perv, but I definitely LOVE mine.
>
> >and, are all 100/2's multicoated?
>
> Yes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> /Gary Schloss.
> Studio City, CA
> schloss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|