At 10:31 AM 1/24/99 -0800, 'james olson' wrote:
>can any owners of this lens comment on their opinions? i have seen
>quite a few 85/2's and 100/2.8's, but i've never seen the 100/2. it's
>big and bulky, but i would think it's optics are a real cracker..... as
>the 100/2.8 is the one lens in my lineup i wish to replace, the 100/2
>seems the perfect replacement.
Everyone knows my opinion of this lens, about which I have no (zero, zip,
zilch, nada, sweet F.A., bugger-all, not a sausage) *objective* information on.
I love it -- makes me feel (and, in the results, look) like a professional.
Yes, it's heavy, but then the best results I've achieved with it have usually
been paired up with a tripod anyways, so no big deal. (Mind you, I got a
couple of candids at a family reunion that also really impressed people, so...)
>and does anyone have a 100/2 they would like to sell??
Only when you can pry it out of my cold, dead fingers. 8^>
Garth
"A bad day doing photography is better
than a good day doing just about
anything else."
The Unofficial Olympus Web Photo Gallery at:
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|