On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:23:01 -0600, dhurley@xxxxxxxx jammed all night, and by
sunrise was overheard remarking:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:34:39 -0700 mstoesz@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stoesz)
> writes:
> >I appears that I may be adding an OM-G to the stable of OM's. Are
> >they animprovement over the OM10?
> I've had an OM-G for a number of years, use it as a backup body when I
> can get it away from the kids. Is it better than the OM-10? I think so.
Yup. I have an OM-G as a second or third body, as well. In other
countries, it's called the OM-20, which would tend to make you think
it's an improvement over the OM-10. I suppose the obvious improvement is
the traditional manual speed dial around the lens mount, where the OM-10
needs the add-on speed control to offer manual control.
> Don't have to mess with any manual adapter and works with the
> motordrive. Downside-- no dedicated flash at this level. Have not had
> any problems with it mechanically or electrically. I think this little
> body is often under-rated.
I think so. Routinely, OM-10s go for more on e-bay than OM-Gs. I don't
really know why, unless maybe the OM-G is just not well known. Or crazy
people are buying stuff on e-bay...
--
Dave Haynie | V.P. Technology, Met@box Infonet, AG | http://www.metabox.de
Be Dev #2024 | NB851 Powered! | Amiga 2000, 3000, 4000, PIOS One
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|