Ken Norton <image66@xxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly:
> >ObOM: How "heavy" is the center weighting in the OM-2n meter compared
> > to the OM-1? Same? Less?
>
>
> Variable. The OM-1 has a heavy center weight that swings from side to side
> like a pendelum. I suppose that it's around 20 grams. The OM-2n has a
> lighter weight center but the walls are quite heavy. It's center is about
Hmmn, I wonder if recent results indicating a nonzero neutrino mass
will affect the behaviour of those weights? Or how about a new
defense from bad minilabs: "It's not our fault, a passing gravity wave must
have affected your light meter!".
> Ok, I'll shut-up now.
>
"Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my
breakfast cereal!" (STR)
> Ken (adding fuel to digest noise fire) Norton
>
Been sniffing Pyrogallol, Ken?
p.s. Just to keep this on-topic(ish) I find that contrary to my
expectation, shooting on auto makes me think *more* about
exposure---I'm still thinking "do I need to correct that
reading?", and twisting a compensation dial takes more thought than
just tweaking aperture or shutter to bias the reading...
cjb
--
------------------ Linux hackers do it in protected mode -------------------
| Christopher Biggs - Software Engineer, Stallion Technologies, Australia |
| chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Ph+61-7-3270-4266 - Fx+61-7-3270-4245 - PGP&MIME |
------- Mathematics and alcohol don't mix --- Never drink and derive -------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|