Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-2SP vs Delta 3200

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-2SP vs Delta 3200
From: Richard Ross <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 10:17:06
At 23:49 16/01/99 +0200, you wrote:
>I have used PROVIA 1600 on many occasions with my 4Ti and could not remake
the
>results you described. Are you sure your dial is at 3200, and there are no +-
>exposures on?
>

Yep.  Try this:  set ASA 3200, auto mode, and check the meter reading with
a lens fitted and *with the lens cap on*.  Both my 2SPs read the equivalent
of 1/15 at f4 approx.  My OM-4 reads 1/8 at f4 approx.  In manual mode, the
"correct" exposure is indicated also as 1/15 at f4.  An automatic exposure
on the 2SP is about 3 seconds yet the meter indicates 1/15.  This suggests
that the manual mode metering (and auto mode indication) in such low light
conditions is suspect, and as I said, it resulted in hopelessly
underexposed negs.  I'll use auto next time....   I'd be interested to know
if the 4T is any better in this respect. I guess it's not a problem with
the OM-1 and OM-2 since you wouldn't be able to see the meter needle :-)

Cheers
Richard


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz