Subject: | Re: [OM] End of the OM-2 line |
---|---|
From: | Matthias Wilke <Matthias.K.Wilke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 6 Jan 1999 02:20:00 +0200 |
I was always under the impression that there weren't any OM1's in production at the same time as OM3's and there were no OM 2's in production at the same time as the 4's. Didn't one supersede the other? Not absolutely, the OM-4 is older than the OM-2SP. Matthias < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Battery drain, GMA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] the OM-101 is not that bad, Matthias Wilke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] End of the OM-2 line, Charles Loeven |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] End of the OM-2 line, Per Nordenberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |