Giles wrote:
> I for one don't have to admit any such thing. Do these cameras
> somehow guarantee better results than are achievable with an OM?
> Technical jingoisim and such absolutism is pointless.
>
> I have a Nikon F601 and a 4Ti. I could easily point out the huge
> technical superiority of the former over the latter. In pure
> technical terms it's no contest. However, superior ergonomics and
> elegant simplicity make the latter the 'better' camera for ME.
>
> For you or someone else the Nikon or whatever might be the 'better'
> camera, so go for it and enjoy.
>
> Giles
>
comparing an F601 to an OM4T....come one Giles, you can do better than
that...
You might was well compared the Nikon F50 for that matter.
Try a Contax or a Leica, and SEE the difference.
Still, the OM has a special place in my heart, and dont plan to give it
up.
--
Regards,
Alexander
http://www.mediadyne.gr/photos
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|