Subject: | Re: [OM] Memories and thoughts |
---|---|
From: | sje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:42:41 +0000 |
Alexander wrote: >The OM2 was about as hi tech as it gets 14 years ago... I don't think so - the OM4 was Olympus' top SLR then, and other companies had SLRs which were considerably more advanced than the OM2. My point was that hi tech is not *necessarily* better than low tech. Simon E. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM4T battery problem, Rand E. Tomcala |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] OM-2S/P - the forgotten OM camera? (was: Four new pictures), Per Nordenberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Memories and thoughts, George Conklin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Memories and thoughts, Charles Loeven |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |