Currently, I own several cameras from various eras and makes (Nikon,
Olympus, Minolta, Fuji, etc). I've got a Nikon N50 which I am relatively
satisfied with, save for the exposure meter. My $99 Olympus Stylus has
a more accurate meter than the much more expensive Nikon.
Now here's my question.
I'm considering an Olympus SLR. I've read all the Oly faqs I can get my
hands on, but I'm still left wondering a few things. I've picked up on the
idea that OM-1,2,3,4 cameras seem to be more robust/solid than the
OMF-F/G/etc. but I can't seem to find out why. Isn't the OM-G (or is it F)
the camera with the semi-autofocus (focus indicator)? Does this system
work very well? Or do you think I should try an OM-1 or 2 (3's and 4's
are out of my price range)?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|