Same here. For me, the 2N was the pinnacle of reliable OM electronic
bodies.
John
Scj9000@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/17/98 4:20:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> << since the 1960s I have
> owned numerous non-OM Olympus cameras all with Zuikos and still have a
> couple of them (as well as an OM2n). Are they excluded from the subject
> matter of this List? >>
>
> Keith,
> Not at all...for many of us the OM2 still stands as the epitome of what the OM
> system is all about...compact, innovative, reliable, and not overloaded with
> superflous electronics. For more on the OM2's, check out the archives...it is
> brimming with info.
> Susan
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|