If anyone along a line, say from Gallup to Datil, to Socorro, Las
Cruces, Tularosa, and Alamagordo happens to be looking at the sky, at
say 7 AM tomorrow, and happens to get a picture, I'd sure appreciate a
copy.
Thanks, Gary Edwards
>Return-Path: <owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Received: from deimos.flash.net (deimos.flash.net [209.30.0.43])
> by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14597;
> Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:27:10 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from zuiko.sls.bc.ca (Zuiko.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.252])
> by deimos.flash.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA16648;
> Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:27:09 -0600 (CST)
>Received: (from daemon@localhost)
> by zuiko.sls.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA12470
> for olympus-outgoing; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:15:05 -0800
>Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.253])
> by zuiko.sls.bc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA12466
> for <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:15:00 -0800
>Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net
(scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.49])
> by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA31344
> for <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:15:00 -0800
>Received: from default (ipb76.st.petersburg4.fl.pub-ip.psi.net
[38.30.153.76])
> by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA12067
> for <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:14:21 -0800 (PST)
>Message-ID: <003501be256c$fd24dde0$4c991e26@default>
>From: "Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [OM] OM 3Ti - OM 4Ti - OM 4T question
>Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:16:02 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>Sender: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-UIDL: 689a04ef502e02d2805c9d7484d4e4ff
>
><<There is a place for both the OM-3Ti and the OM-4Ti. The former
wears
>better
>and has selectable shutter speeds even if the battery runs out (albeit
no
>metering in such a case). It would be my camera of choice in harsh
>conditions
>(including very high humidity or sub freezing temperatures). I'd have
a
>tough
>time choosing only one camera body! In order of preference:
>OM-4 series: general all around work, esp. with a Motor Drive 2
>OM-2S: for shooting situations where things happen too fast to fuss
with
>exposure
>OM-3 series: as a perfect backup camera re: reliability
>OM-1n: for mirror lockup situations (esp. copy work) and locals where
theft
>is
>an issue
>OM-2n: for elegant simplicity of operation (like the OM-1n) but where
an
>automatic exposure option is desired.>>
>
>Odd that you should post this now.
>I have been meaning to pose a similar question to the list for my own
>information and
>just for fun. The question:
>If you had to choose only one OM body to own and rely on, which one
would it
>be?
>Why?
>OM5 and 6 not eligible. :-)
>
>Charlie
>
>Charles Loeven
>cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|