| Subject: | Re: [OM] response to my filter questions.... |
|---|---|
| From: | "Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Dec 1998 17:21:07 -0800 |
<<if you note the cost of B&W circular polarizers. >> Is there a need for circular polarisers with OM's? Charles Loeven cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] f/2 vs. f/2.8 primes......., Wayne Harridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: [OM] f/2 vs. f/2.8 primes......., Charles Loeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] response to my filter questions...., *- DORIS FANG -* |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] response to my filter questions...., Jan Steinman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |