>
>Great photojournalism of accident scenes and such does not require, or even
>suggest, showing the victim in an identifiable way.
>
>As Brad mentioned, you can get great, expressive, compelling, whatever
>you're after shots of accident scenes without showing the victim at all.
>What's more interesting, anyway - a face covered in blood, or a team of
>rescuers trying to gain access to an overturned truck with the cab crushed
>inward?
:) Jay gets it :)
>ObOM: I'd like to get some good photographs of accident scenes, and the best
>way to do so unintrusively at night is available light - of which not a lot
>is sometimes available. If I go to some kind of superfast film and nice fast
>lenses (100/2 or so), am I gonna be able to take pictures that I can show
>people later, or will the grain or the camera shake or the wide variations
>in exposure from where the medics are pointing their flashlights and the
>rest of the scene conspire against me? Will I need to go out and get an OM-4
>to have any chance of getting reliable meter readings?
There was an article awhile back I read about a photographer who worked
exclusively photographing firemen working fires (mostly night scenes). I
honestly don't know if I have the article or not. But if I do, I'll send
it to you.
Happy Thanksgiving,
Brad
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|