Subject: | Re: [OM] Stylus Epic, OM-1 vs 24/21 |
---|---|
From: | PCACala@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 8 Nov 1998 18:45:28 EST |
George writes: > > I agree completely with John on this. Get the 21/3.5 It's a great > > lens. But you will have to spend more time 'learning' the 21 than a > > 24. But it'll be worth it. Since I'm now using George's old 21, I'll just comment that some might take to a 21mm fast. If you have mastered the next closest focal length (24mm) you will find the 21 technique to be no sweat. I even tried out a 17mm and the results knocked my socks off. Seems I've been "seeing" pictures at those focal lengths for eons, I just couldn't capture them. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Shutter speeds, gma |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Car Charger for 15V NiCd control pack ?, Shawn Wright |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Stylus Epic, OM-1 vs 24/21, Shawn Wright |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Stylus Epic, OM-1 vs 24/21, Jan Steinman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |