Subject: | [OM] Zuiko 35-70/f3.6 (was "200mm f5 vs. 100mm f2.8 & 2XA") |
---|---|
From: | KenK1ZYW@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 1 Nov 1998 08:53:59 EST |
I have experience with the Vivitar 19mm/f3.8 MC and I paid $95 for it (I don't remember if it was new or used - but it looks new). It is a great little lens and fits my kit nicely between 16mm fisheye and 24mm/f2.8. I've been impressed with it and it is the only non Zuiko lens that I really like. Hope this helps Ken M. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OM-G Chrome, KenK1ZYW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] CALL FOR DISCUSSION: Split the list, Wijsmuller . VanderBel |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM-G Chrome, KenK1ZYW |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 35-70/f3.6 (was "200mm f5 vs. 100mm f2.8 & 2XA"), Clive Warren |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |