But Gary,
What you say is true, and I agree. That's why I have an OM2,OM2n,OM1,
OM1n, and a Pen FT (with OM and Nikon adapter) as well as the Leica CL
(really just kept for investment). With that body array and the lens
that I have, "it don't get much funner than that!"
Rand E.
P.S. This disregards the freaky stuff. ie 4x5, Minox, Minolta 16, and
the not so freaky Oly XA2 and a Trip 35
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>PCACala@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi Rand E:
>
> > Mine is in mint- condition with maybe 10-15 rolls thru
> > it for the simple reasons that it is too expensive to carry and most of
> > all, it's not fun to use.
>
> Interesting. Once upon a time I seem to recall it was an alternative to my
> buying a OM-1. Looks like I might have made a good choice to go Olympus. I
> enjoyed rangefinder cameras, esp. with bright optical finders, but the through
> the lens views of a borrowed Pen F and Nikon F sold me on the benefits of the
> SLR.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|