On Sat, 12 Sep 1998, Jim Loudon wrote:
After Doris spouted:
> > The Stylus (1st version, not Epic) is definitely inferior,
> > lens-wise, to the XA.
>
> Did I miss an "IMHO"? :-)
*COUGH* sputter...bluuuuuuuusssssh. Ahem...well...yes, there should
have been an IMHO in there. :-P~~~~
> You're about the last person I'd want to disagree with, Doris,
> but that hasn't been my experience. I'd rate the overall optical
> performance of my mju-1 to be at least the equal of my XA. Maybe
> it's sample variation, but this is what I see with mine. Your
> experience is obviously different, and given the number of XAs
> you own, you're obviously a _big_ XA fan.
Yes, I agree, there's too many variables, and I hardly do microscope
& target lens tests. Jim's gentlemanly stance is more than admirable.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|