Subject: | Re: [OM] 100 f2.8 vs 85 f2 |
---|---|
From: | Steven_Read@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 1998 11:27:47 -0400 |
Despite having both the 85/2 and 100/2.8 (and using them primarily for portraits) my current inamorata for faces is the 180/2.8. Why settle for a mere 100! ;-) I think what is actually doing it for me is that the tele has a shallower depth of field for a given f-stop and, well, all these lenses are pretty fine with great bokeh. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction., PCACala |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Techno Bable and the Future of Photography, PCACala |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100 f2.8 vs 85 f2, Shawn Wright |
Next by Thread: | [OM] 100 f2.8 vs 85 f2, KenK1ZYW |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |