Subject: | Re: [OM] Digital vs. film |
---|---|
From: | "Ken Norton" <image66@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Sep 1998 15:21:56 -0500 |
>ps. The "pretentious? moi?" bit was meant to be a jokey double entendre >from a long time ago (in the UK); I did not mean you to infer that I >thought you pretentious. cb Come on, we all are Zuikoholics--which means we are pretentious by nature, doesn't it? Ken N. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Instrutions and Specs for____, Frank van Lindert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 150-300/f4 (dreaming again), EdMall |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital vs. film, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital vs. film, sje |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |