On Mer, 2 set 1998 19:06, gma <mailto:gma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Good points. I did look at the test results on Pauls' site and the
100-200
>has
>'EX' ratings at the corners at all apertures. Maybe they 'over-designed'
this
>one? Maybe this one sample was better than others? Ken reports loads of
>barrel
>distortion. The test says 1.13%, which I guess is relatively high. For
>comparison, the 85-250 shows '<1%' and the 35-105 has '0.7%'
>
1 0s a quite low distortion. Less than 0.5 0s enough even for a macro
lens.
The 85-250 is a high quality pro-lens that was sold for $1.000 while the
100-200 was intended as an amateur lens.
Marco
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|