MorrisMini@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> I have been searching the archives to get the lowdown on the 200 f/4 and 200
> f/5 Zuikos but get only passing mention. The f/4 seems to be readily
> available, new and used, the f/5 takes some scrounging. According to Paul
> Farrar's excellent Zuiko page, I see that the f/5 is smaller, lighter, and
> takes 49mm filters, but what about the resolution and general performance?
> Anyone tried both?
According to F. Pangerl, the Olympus related author of World of the
OM-System, it´s one of his favourite lenses and should be as good as the
200mm/4.0 a lens which I can recomend.
Richard
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|