Michael;
So, even with the blue fringing, you're able to do good astrophotography? With
the 1B I presume?
george
Michael A. Covington wrote:
> Answering Paul's question in today's digest, the 180/2.8 does indeed have
> some chromatic aberration. This is not a repairable malfunction -- it's a
> matter of design. The 180/2.8 is comparable to other top-brand lenses from
> the era before ED glass; fast telephotos always have some residual chromatic
> aberration.
>
> I always use a 1B filter (strong skylight filter) with my 180/2.8; it cuts
> down the blue fringing appreciably.
>
> But you may prefer to get an ED glass lens of more modern design. I don't
> know exactly what's available; I think Sigma may make something suitable.
> Nikon does, but you have to have a Nikon camera body... I have not tested
> the 180/2.8 against any other maker's lens. I've done some beautiful
> astrophotography with mine.
>
> Michael A. Covington / AI Center / The University of Georgia
> http://www.ai.uga.edu/~mc http://www.mindspring.com/~covington <><
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|