Mark wrote:
> Ingemar,
> I have owned both of these lenses for more than a decade now. I
> aquired the 1000/11 first and found it quite execelent. Since getting
> the 600/6.5 I have not had the 1000/11 out with me. I find, on my two
> lenses, that the 600 has superior contrast. It is also far eaiser to
> transport and use being only 2/3 the size of the 1000/11 and about 3
> pounds lighter. It is very hard to justify carrying both with me.
So both are worth to buy? I must confess I can't afford neither, nor any other
more
expensive lens at the moment. Still I would like to have them as I love to photo
wildlife. Therefore I bought a 300/4.5 to get more close to animals instead of
using
the 200/4 (still using it however, but to other than wildlife). I now find the
300/4.5 too short a focal length and I guess adding a Zuiko 1.4x TC and get
420/6.3
will not be enough. So, the thing is to get the 600/6.5 first as they are much
more
common than the 1000/11.
Arghh! Money needed!
Folks, I WILL accept any donations!
--
Regards/
Ingemar Uvhagen
Gislaved, Sweden
- Netscape Communicator user -
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|