Wrote Ingemar Uvhagen:
>Now, the reason I write is to hear any comment on the 100/2.8. How good
>is it? I have been looking through the tests at R. Lee Hawkins' page,
>but the info on the 100/2.8 is way under the info on the 100/2. So I
>would like to hear if anyone of you list members have the Zuiko 100/2.8,
>if so, what can you tell?
The 100/2.8 is a delightful lens. Optical quality is very good, though the
early, single-coated versions were somewhat prone to flare in adverse
lighting. In any case, see that you get the lens shade (it is identical with
that for the 85/2, a rigid rubber screw-on type).
For several years, my only OM lenses were this one (single-coated) and
a 35/2.8. I was so poor I had to sell it in order to buy the 85/2. Now I have
found another and bought it. Enough said.
Hälsningar/Regards
Lars Bergquist
Timberwolf Type, the independent
specialist in text typefaces - visit me at
<http://www.timberwolf.a.se/>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|