Subject: | Re: Scanning (Was: Re: [OM] HCB - OM eqivalent to Leica M + 35/2?) |
---|---|
From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Aug 1998 19:28:13 +1000 |
>Audio data is only slightly different the visual data. On the subject of >audio, it is true that 44.1 kHz is barely sufficient for quality audio. The >recording industry has been switching over from 48kHz tracking (later to >convert to 44.1 for CD mastering), to 96 kHz tracking What is the term oversampling then? I thought I understood it, but then the yterm 1bit sampling came out, and I'm totally lost. Thanks Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Mirror, mirror, on the mount, which ones suck, which ones count!, Terry and Tracey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Mirror, mirror, on the mount, which ones suck, which ones count!, Terry and Tracey |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Bits and music was scanning, Denton Taylor |
Next by Thread: | Re: Scanning (Was: Re: [OM] HCB - OM eqivalent to Leica M + 35/2?), Omer Nezih Gerek |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |