have any members of this list compared images from the 65-200 f/4 zoom,
compared to lenses such as the 100/2.8 and the 200/5 for example. i
recently returned from a long trip, (india, nepal, sikkim) in which i
brought a 50/3.5 macro and a 100/2.8, opting to leave the 65-200 at
home. i find the zoom is difficult to hand hold, if not impossible...
the images from the 50 and the 100 i am very impressed with ( i hope to
post images on the olympus gallery soon... need scanner)
i haven't had time to test the zoom yet, so i was hoping to learn how
people feel the zoom compares to primes optically....
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|