If that 35-105 is clean, grab it at that price.
John
claude wrote:
> I have a 35mm 2.0 on layaway at the local camera store. When I first saw
> it there was no pric/e tag on it, but the sales person put one for 169
> dollars on it. Foolishly I di not put it on laway right then. When I went
> back the greedy owner had upped the price to 289 dollars, I got him to come
> back down but only to 200 dollars. It seems like a good lens, any
> experiences? There is a 35-105 zuiko as well for 150 dollars. My question
> is: is this a genuine olympus lens, or is it manufactured by a third party
> and tagged as an olympus? And is the zoom lens any good? If so, I may get
> it. Plus I would like an OM4T, but a friend who fixes cameras says that
> the little black deal on the lens mount invariably breaks and costs big
> bucks to fix. Any comments? Then I have an 85mm 2.0 which has flecks of
> black coating inside the barrel, does this affect the picture taking
> capabilities? Also I have an old 135mm singlecoated zuiko with oil on the
> diaphragm blades, is it worth fixing for 60 bucks, or should I look for a
> replacement?
>
> Thanks all, this is my first posting here.
>
> CB
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|