On Mer, 22 lug 1998 3:02, Winsor Crosby <mailto:wincros@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Any enlightenment?
>
>Winsor
>
I dont' know, but I can make this simple consideration: If a lens can do on
a SF camera we can assume that the same lens, doubled (that is eight times
fat, in solids) could do on MF.
For instance take the old 20 4 Nikkor for F compared to the 40 4 Nikkor for
Bronica... They are the same lens, that is the Nikkor for Bronica is a
Nikkor for F on steroids...
Well, we can conclude that also the optical qualities must be "doubled" and
the Bronica lens shall have half the resolution than the F one, but on a
larger film.
A similar consideration was made on this list comparing Zuikos 100 2.8 and
180 2.8.
Marco
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|