Lars Haven wrote:
>I finally found the article I mentioned last week. I must admit
>that my memory was not entirely precise. It was not 100,000 exposures
>the guy had made. It was 200,000! Sorry about that little mistake.
[snip]
That's great information, especially for some among us who have
recently replaced their old, trusty, if somewhat pedestrian OM-1's
with sophisticated, feature-laden, expensive, but apparently not
quite reliable German designs e.g. the Contax RX ;-)
Oh, and btw, how many X's are allowed in a camera name before it
becomes a legitimate object for target practice? Just wondering...
;-)
Cheers,
/Gary Schloss.
Studio City, CA
schloss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|