ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole

Subject:	Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole
From:	WKato@xxxxxxx
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 1998 23:55:53 EDT

In a message dated 98-07-13 16:39:59 EDT, you write:

<< I don't see that an optical adapter is a necessity.  >>

After I saw the Sinarcam I agree.

Warren

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, (continued) Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Ingemar Uvhagen Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, John Petrush Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, C.H.Ling [OM] color repro (was Oly hole), Denton Taylor [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Shawn Wright Re:[OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Tomoko Yamamoto [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Tomoko Yamamoto Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Shawn Wright Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, John Austin Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Paul D. Farrar Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, WKato <= Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Terry and Tracey Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Denton Taylor Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Tomoko Yamamoto Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, ONLYOLYBW Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, John Austin

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OM-5?, gma
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Velvia speed, C.H.Ling
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Paul D. Farrar
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re: Why Oly is in a hole, Terry and Tracey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]