Subject: | Re: [OM] Questions, questions... |
---|---|
From: | Lars Bergquist <timberwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jul 1998 18:37:49 +0000 |
Wrote Ingemar from Gislaved: >I guess internal focus is a newer design than "normal lens focusing", if >so they >must have developed it to give lenses improvement. Now, how much better in >performance is an IF lens compared to a "normal"?Just curious. Internal focusing does not per se improve performance. It is basically no different from front cell focusing (on those old folders), it just does away with a long and cumbersome helical on long lenses. Perhaps some people mix this up with floating elements which is a different matter. This reconfigures helical-focusing lenses internally in order to optimize performance over a greater range of magnifications (I seem to have heard that lenses normaly are optimized for a focusing distance of 10 meters). Hälsningar/Regards Lars Bergquist Timberwolf Type, 'the independent specialist in text typefaces' - visit me at http/www.timberwolf.a.se/ < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: inviting Olympus to join the list, Gary Schloss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] more on snakes etc (ZERO OM content), Ulf Westerberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Questions, questions..., Ingemar Uvhagen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Questions, questions..., lion1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |