| Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus Petition |
|---|---|
| From: | Richard Schätzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Jun 1998 18:28:56 +0200 |
Terry and Tracey wrote: > > But extension means greater diffraction at smaller apertures. Everything has > it's pros and cons. Or it means just smaller apertures, with extensions the real apertures (not the printed ones) get smaller. Richard < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] opinions and questions-which OM?, John Petrush |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Hasselblad to launch 35mm camera, Richard Schätzl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus Petition, Terry and Tracey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus Petition, WKato |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |