An OM-1 might have more consistent high speeds than an electronic OM
(especially that all important first shot after the camera has sat ((oil on
the magnet)).
John
Jim Loudon wrote:
> > Any reason to assume that the "electronic" OMs (OM-2S, etc.) have either
> > more accurate or more stable shutters than the OM-1s? I have heard this
> > but wonder if it is borne out in real life.
>
> Just one data point with one sample pair (and my son just wrapped
> up his first science fair project, where he heard _all_ about the
> need for more than one sample :-) )...
>
> At the Mid-Atlantic Oly Fest earlier this year (thanks again
> Tomoko!), I had the opportunity to have the shutters of my OM-1
> and OM-2 checked by another lister (thanks Rand!). The shutters
> of both camearas were consistent (answers the stability point).
> The OM-2's shutter was absolutely spot on according to the tester;
> the OM-1 was typically about ten percent slow. In either case,
> a very good result for a pair of cameras that haven't been
> serviced in a while. In particular, my OM-2 is not what one
> would call a particlarly "clean" example, but it's still able
> to deliver the goods.
>
> Rand's comment to me was that this was pretty typical performance
> of the Olympus' he's seen (and he's seen many) -- the electronic
> shutters are extremely accurate; the mechanical shutters just a
> shade less accurate, but they're all very good indeed.
>
> As I said, just one data point...and no, we didn't put the
> cameras in the freezer to see how they would behave at low
> temperatures :-)
>
> jim
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|