Andre,
What camera are you using it in?
Joel
At 09:36 PM 5/27/1998 -0700, you wrote:
>Well Olympiads,
>
>I tried out my new 2-4 screen and IMHO the Beattie wins hands down. It is
>far brighter. In fact I found myself swapping screens, the Beattie for the
>2-4, from one camera to another when shooting in low light with a 85 to 200
>f4 telephoto zoom. For the difference in price the difference in brightness
>is really worth it. $42 (2-4 PVT)versus $65(B&H Beattie). I find that I
>can get the critical focusing with the Beattie whereas in comparison with
>the 2-4 I am not quite sure I'm really right on in low lite/low constrast
>situations. And with the 2-4 it looks dingy through the viewfinder in
>comparision to the Beattie.
>
>I can't muster the exponential leap in $$$ for f2.0, f2.8 lens, but because
>of the difference in brightness performance the Beattie helps me forget
>the slowness of my lens at least when looking through them.
>
>Andre
>
>San Carlos, CA
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|