>Lee is correct, the 2S board is cousin to the 4 and bears no resemblance to
>spartan simplicity (and wonderfulness) of the 2N.
>
>John
>
I wasn't paying sufficient attention when the macro flash / f stop thread
was running. Can someone post me a summary if possible please?
Foxy
>> In your message dated: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 17:35:51 +1000 you write:
>> >A while ago a thread was discussing the minimum distance that the flash
can
>> >cut off, and differences between the 2n and 4T. (I presume the 2SP is
the
>> >same as the 2n, as John H commented the limitation was due to computing
>> >power and spot metering, memory, etc).
>>
>> Bad assumption. The 2SP circuitry is much closer to the 4 than the 2N.
>> I think it has the same sort of limitations as the 4.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --Lee
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|