>*snip*
>>
>>If it supports a rotatable preview I would trade my Nikon for it any day
>>- even if quality was sacrificed slightly, since the Nikon already
>>exceeds the resolution of 100ASA 35mm film. Somehow I doubt that I
>>would need to worry about that last point though.
>>--
>>Kennedy
>>Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
>>A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
>>Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)
>>
>
>I thought the resolution of medium speed film was about 100 lines/mm. The
>CDW catalog I got today lists the resolution of the Coolscan II as 2700
>dpi. Since it takes two dots(one off and one on) to make a line its
>resolution would be roughly 50 lines/mm, if I am not mistaken. It might be
>close to the resolution of an inexpensive paper print.
>
>
Kennedy,
I reread what I wrote after I sent it and it sounds rude. I apologize. I
did not mean it as such. I was just trying in my own mind to understand the
resolution thing.
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|