Subject: | Re: [OM] Macro Lens |
---|---|
From: | Lars Bergquist <timberwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 1998 19:22:34 +0000 |
Wrote Foxy: >Does this mean I'm getting difraction when shooting with my 28mm f3.5 at >smaller than f8? I haven't noticed any. You are always getting diffraction! It occurs whenever the light waves pass an edge, such as the edge of a diaphragm blade, or for that matter that of the mount when the lens is wide open. When stopping down, proportionally more of the light waves have to pass the d... edge, so that diffraction increases, and at last it becomes the major cause of unsharpness. However, only a really good lens can be 'diffraction limited' at small stops. Normally, lens aberrations are more prominent, especially wide open! But without them, diffraction would actually mean that fast lenses would be sharper than slow lenses, period. Warum einfach wenn es kann so schön kompliziert sein? Vänliga hälsningar/Best regards Lars Bergquist Välkommen till/Welcome to ... <http://www.bahnhof.se/~timberwolf/> <thismessagewasdeliveredviatheolympusmailinglist> <forquestions,mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <webpage:http://zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] SoCal, anyone?, Clive Warren |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Shooting the computer screen, Clive Warren |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Macro Lens, Terry and Tracey |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Macro Lens, Terry and Tracey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |