Subject: | Re: [OM] 200mm/5 (Was OM-2S Meter Question) |
---|---|
From: | "John A. Prosper" <prosper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 1998 10:25:10 -0500 (EST) |
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, gma wrote: |Tomoko; | |Thanks for this info. How would you say the lens rates as per sharpness, |contrast, etc? I'm not Tomoko; however, the lens should be sharp. Moderate speed teles are relative easy to design. It is this lens' slowness combined with the availability of the very affordable 200/4 which probably caused its droppage from the Zuiko lineup. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] adapting OM gear to other cameras, John A. Prosper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Somebody that supports OM flash., John A. Prosper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200mm/5 (Was OM-2S Meter Question), gma |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200mm/5 (Was OM-2S Meter Question), Tomoko Yamamoto |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |