>I've got a Tamron 90mm, and I've never thought of getting 100. The
>difference is just a small movement of the camera. If body mount macro is a
>priority, get the 90 by trading the 100.
>
>I wish I had the Zuiko 90mm. The only disadvantage is 55mm filter thread, as
>every other lens I have is 49 or 72.
>
>My opinion anyway.
>
>Foxy
>
>>Hi, I'm thinking of purchasing a 90mm f2 zuiko macro, will this be as good
>>as the
>>100 f2 or f2.8 for non close-up work. My favourite lens is a 100 F2.8 at
>>present,
>>I'm thinking of upgrading it, I do a fair amount of macro. I don't need to
>>buy two similar focal length lenses do I (not at OM prices?).
>>Thanks
>>Richard
>
I have a question for anyone. If macro correction is a large issue in a
lens to be used for macrophotography, why isn't it an issue when using a
lens with macro correction at "normal" shooting distances?
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|