Subject: | Re: [OM] the end game |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <kenorton@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Mar 1998 10:25:44 -0600 |
>No, chemical based imaging will be around for a very long time. The market >will certainly continue to fragment into smaller and smaller pieces but it >will be used by vastly increasing numbers of people. We will have choices >never dreamed of 10 years from now. But choices they will be - as long as >we persist in choosing 35mm film-based imaging technology we will have tools >to apply our art and craft. I'm reminded that the film industry still uses film. How long has video tape been around? Ken Norton < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] the end game/Ink-Jet life ***No OM Content***, Tim Breen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Looking for OM2000, paul haigney |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] the end game, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] the end game, Marco |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |