At 11:16 am -0500 16/2/98, cosmos@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Am I assuming correctly when I say that all Olympus OM lenses
>are AT LEAST single coated?
>
>)))) Daniel Biron
>
>
>>>However, I have had shots ruined every so often because I have not
>>>noticed the flare and I therefore take the belt & braces approach.
>>>But I do like the look of lenses with hoods attached - gives it a
>>>precise, pre-war look I guess ;o). come to think of it, I don't even
>>>know which of my few lenses is MC or otherwise.
>>
>>
>>Well the way it goes approximately is:
>>
>>No Coating 68 0ght transmission
>>Single Coating 95 0ght transmission
>>Multi Coating 98 0ght transmission
>>Super Multi Coating 98 0ght transmission (and marketing hype)
Yep, I've never seen or read about a Zuiko which does not have
multi-coating, unless OM made a very limited number of quartz glass lenses
for UV photography which would have been uncoated ......
All the best,
Clive http://clive.bel-epa.com
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
| listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|